DataVisuals The decision governance company Score your institution

The guidance responds to an executive order and frames immigration status as a proxy for heightened credit risk, yet the enforcement mechanism is entirely documentary: can the institution produce the named underwriter's rationale for each approval, the measurement of income volatility, and the controls that govern exceptions? Institutions that cannot link each loan decision to a documented assessment of willingness and capacity to repay—owner, evidence, rationale—will face criticism not for the lending decision itself but for the absence of the record that proves sound risk management occurred. This is decision governance under regulatory pressure: the artifact protects the institution, and its absence becomes the violation.

From the FDIC release

PRESS RELEASE | JULY 13, 2026 Agencies Issue Guidance on Lending to Individuals Not Legally Authorized to Work in the United States WASHINGTON — The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and…

Read the original FDIC release →

Get these in your inbox.

The weekly executive summary — regulator actions scored for decision-governance relevance. Or follow daily via RSS.

Free. Only when there's activity — quiet weeks, no email.

← Back to all Watch items